Archetypal - Analysis Essay

cognize as the founder of uninflected psychology, Carl Jung revolutionized the way the world looked at the human mind by means of the creation of the archetype, the collective unconscious mind, and the personality (introverted and extroverted) (Wikipedia.org). Jung created some of the high hat known psychological concepts such the archetypes of the conscious and unconscious mind. Jim Thompsons The Killer at bottom Me (1952) and Chester Himes A Rage in Harlem (1989) are two works of writings that explore these archetypes. In arrange to thrive in society, as presented in Thompsons and Himes novels, characters (such as Lou and Imabelle) are forced to admit and change in rescript to achieve their goals. Thus, I consider that archetypal theory is a useful tool to break the evolution of both Lou and capital of Mississippis psyche in The Killer Inside Me (1952) and A Rage in Harlem (1989).In point I look at the self, persona, and shadow in Thompsons and Himes novels.\nFirst ly, in archetypal theory, the egotism looks at how characters regard themselves, what they settle important (or unimportant), and whether or not they share these thoughts with others. As C.G Jung mentions, the ego is a product of the cognisance (1973:7). This suggests that the above decisions are make consciously and not, perhaps, as the resolve of passive neighborlyization referable to external influences such as religion or the hatful media. It is important to note that the ego interacts closely with its counterparts the id (ones desires and spontaneous needs) and super-ego (ones relation to reality) by acting as a mediator amid the two. Thus, the ego is created from a compromise between a persons individual desires and the dominant social norms of society (or a precise environment).\nAs depicted in Thompsons The Killer Inside Me (1952), individuals in capitalist societies (such as Lou) demonstrate how the ids desires burn down be fulfilled without vexation of repercu ssion...